Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Olog-hai

“Wilson left the Lusitania unavenged for two years,”

The Lusitania was a British ship. And it was carrying a large cargo of war munitions. And the Germans took out an ad in the New York Times saying it was a legitimate target of war as a military cargo vessel. They warned everyone that they would sink it if they could.

There was nothing to avenge.
By the way, at that very moment we were a neutral nation. And the Brits were poised, ready, and certain to attack any American merchantmen that wanted to go to a German port.

The Brits were the bad guys of WWI.


42 posted on 10/18/2017 9:54:15 AM PDT by DesertRhino (Dog is man's best friend, and moslems hate dogs. Add that up. ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]


To: DesertRhino

No they were not the bad guys. Please refrain from Obama-esque revisionism; I heard enough of that while in school in Ireland, to boot, from Obama’s ideological forebears/brethren.

Leaving the blood of Americans unavenged advertised US weakness; it was not the British who sank the ship, and that is the bottom line.


52 posted on 10/18/2017 9:59:21 AM PDT by Olog-hai ("No Republican, no matter how liberal, is going to woo a Democratic vote." -- Ronald Reagan, 1960)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]

To: DesertRhino
The Lusitania was a British ship. And it was carrying a large cargo of war munitions.

That is still hotly debated. Robert Ballard, the Titanic discovery thinks the ship went down so fast because coal dust ignited.

188 posted on 10/18/2017 4:50:43 PM PDT by x
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson