Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Spktyr

I always thought the F-105 was an interesting choice to serve as a Wild Weasel plane...it seemed so big and ungainly...

Being a Wild Weasel pilot is a hell of a way to earn a living!


6 posted on 10/18/2017 6:03:15 AM PDT by rlmorel (Liberals: American Liberty is the egg that requires breaking to make their Utopian omelette.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: rlmorel

I worked on those at George afb


15 posted on 10/18/2017 7:54:20 AM PDT by Iron head mike (If we are descended from apes why are there still apes????)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: rlmorel

The F-105 flew air defense suppression as a matter of circumstance. It’s primary mission before Vietnam was nuclear strike. The Weasel mission was developed in the F-100. Unfortunately the F-100 lacked durability and speed - both of which the F-105 had in spades.


16 posted on 10/18/2017 8:08:26 AM PDT by Tuttle214
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: rlmorel

17 posted on 10/18/2017 8:13:28 AM PDT by NorthMountain (... the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: rlmorel
The first wild weasel configured airplane was actually the F-100F. It did not have the range to "go north" effectively.

The F-105F (later-G) was later used because it was already in theater WRT support and maintenance and was on the way out as a first line fighter bomber in TAC elsewhere.

In short, the F-105 was available and expendable. My scoutmaster went down in one of the first F-105F Wild Weasel missions, he was the GIB.

Capt Ben Newsome RIP.

20 posted on 10/18/2017 8:28:14 AM PDT by pfflier
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: rlmorel

“I always thought the F-105 was an interesting choice to serve as a Wild Weasel plane...it seemed so big and ungainly...
Being a Wild Weasel pilot is a hell of a way to earn a living!”

Initially, USAF used the F-100 for the counter-radar mission, but it was too slow, too short-legged, and hauled too light a warload. Couldn’t keep up with F-105 strike packages.

Bigger and faster, the F-105 was more easily modified to add a second seat, and could hold more avionics, rendering it more capable against enemy fire-control radar systems. And it could haul a larger warload, not only in terms of weight but in variety of munitions.

Maneuverability was not a factor. The surface-to-air-missiles of those days were not difficult to out-turn - if the aircrew detected them in time.

Many forum members set great store by a warplane’s capability to execute tight turns, but their notions are out of date. “Dogfighting” has almost no importance in modern air combat, and it’s been that way since before the Second World War.


22 posted on 10/18/2017 9:12:46 AM PDT by schurmann
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson