I don’t think you have truly placed yourself in that scenario to weigh how it would really sit with you, assuming you have bills to pay and need a job. Unless you are someone who changes jobs every few months and does not build a career.
First, your analogy is not appropriate since the Weinstein scenario was presumably between a male and female, whereas your hypothetical scenario is between a homosexual male and a heterosexual male.
Second, apparently the definition of harassment has been dumbed down by lawyers, SJWs and virtue signalers because the “Bob” Weinstein situation as described in the subject article seems a long way from any kind of harassment I know about. If I were on a jury, based on those facts alone, I would find for the defendant.
Third, you don’t know anything about me.