To: leaymane
As a Trump supporter, I have no problem in banning bump stocks. Why does anyone need to fire that many rounds in such a short period of time? We have two Glock handguns. Anyone who tries to harm my family or me will have to answer to about 30 rounds fired one at a time.
11 posted on
10/15/2017 7:01:02 PM PDT by
DennisR
(Look around - God gives countless, indisputable clues that He does, indeed, exist.)
To: DennisR
Why you say?
the obvious answer follows:
there are scenarios (situations) when you will not be able to get a clean injuring/deadly shot on an attacker, but armed with a selective fire rifle, you would be able to fire short or long bursts as needed until those you are protecting have found COVER and not concealment.
FYI
15 posted on
10/15/2017 7:05:49 PM PDT by
txnativegop
(The political left, Mankinds intellectual hemlock)
To: DennisR
The problem is a problem of camels and noses.
28 posted on
10/15/2017 7:17:05 PM PDT by
arthurus
To: DennisR
“Why does anyone need to fire that many rounds in such a short period of time?”
Why do you need a `high capacity’ magazine?
Why do you need a caliber larger than .22 LR?
Why do you need anything besides a shotgun?
Why do you need a shotgun?
See how this works?
39 posted on
10/15/2017 8:09:48 PM PDT by
tumblindice
(America's founding fathers: all armed conservatives)
To: DennisR
“... Why does anyone need to fire that many rounds ...”
-
Why is it a problem to you?
42 posted on
10/15/2017 8:15:14 PM PDT by
Repeal The 17th
(I was conceived in liberty, how about you?)
To: DennisR
Why does anyone need to fire that many rounds in such a short period of time? Because PEOPLE LIKE YOU want the government to come take arms away from us, and someday, we will need suppressive fire against such jackbooted thugs.
44 posted on
10/15/2017 8:24:29 PM PDT by
backwoods-engineer
(Trump won; we got Gorsuch and a bit of the MAGA agenda. But now the Swamp is back in control.)
To: DennisR
"Why does anyone need to fire that many rounds in such a short period of time?"
Why does anyone need to drive a motor vehicle for nothing more than getting to entertainment? Driving is more dangerous than firearms.
Not long ago, a terrorist in Europe used a vehicle to run over and kill many people at once. Maybe someone here can tell us about that body count.
45 posted on
10/15/2017 8:24:50 PM PDT by
familyop
("Welcome to Costco. I love you." --Costco greeter in the movie, "Idiocracy")
To: DennisR
Maybe you should read the constitution. Does “shall not be infringed” ring a bell? A bump stock is part of “arms” and banning it is clear infringement. That’s the end of the matter constitutionally speaking.
48 posted on
10/15/2017 8:27:43 PM PDT by
Durus
(You can avoid reality, but you cannot avoid the consequences of avoiding reality. Ayn Rand)
To: DennisR
As a Trump supporter, I have no problem in banning bump stocks. Why does anyone need to fire that many rounds in such a short period of time? We have two Glock handguns. Anyone who tries to harm my family or me will have to answer to about 30 rounds fired one at a time.
Why do you need to fire 30 rounds in that short of a time? A bump stock simply makes your finger pull the trigger faster, it does nothing illegal or even unConstitutionally illegal either.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson