Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Perez Refuses to Say if DNC Will Return All Weinstein Contributions
Washington Free Beacon ^ | 10/14/17 | David Ruiz

Posted on 10/14/2017 6:04:59 PM PDT by markomalley

Democratic National Committee chair Tom Perez would not say Friday whether the DNC would return all of its contributions from movie mogul Harvey Weinstein as he stands accused of decades of sexual harassment and assault.

Weinstein is a longtime Democratic donor who has given $300,000 to the DNC. However, the DNC announced last week it was only donating $30,000 of that money. Furthermore, the groups getting the cash were openly pro-Democratic organizations Higher Heights, Emily's List, and Emerge America.

After an event at the University of Wisconsin on Friday, Perez was asked by a tracker whether the DNC would return its contributions from Weinstein.

"You have a nice weekend, sir," Perez said without looking.

DNC vice-chair Keith Ellison (D., Minn.) similarly dodged the question when asked about the subject on Wednesday.

"I don't have any comments for you right now. I don't know you, and I don't take questions like this," Ellison said sharply.

Under Perez, the DNC has struggled in fundraising and was more than $4 million in debt as of an August fundraising report.

Weinstein's downfall in the aftermath of reports of his behavior has been swift. He has been fired from The Weinstein Company, and on Saturday the Oscar-winning producer was ousted from the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences.

Dozens of women have accused Weinstein of harassment and abuse in the wake of bombshell reports from the New York Times and New Yorker.

Weinstein has bundled or donated millions of dollars over the years for top Democrats, including Hillary Clinton, who have condemned his conduct and announced they are donating his contributions.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS:

1 posted on 10/14/2017 6:04:59 PM PDT by markomalley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: markomalley

There always will be male decision makers in businesses.

Often, females are needed in businesses where sex appeal is required. The sex appeal gets customers, both male (for their libido) and female (who look for role models).

Entertainment roles, media roles, waitresses, barmaids, music venues, fashion retail, industrial sales etc.

So, most women do not want to use their body to access employment and rightly so.

However, some women are willing. Those women will have an advantage. The male decision maker can say that the “willing” female better fit the organization or some other intangible reason why she is there.

This is bad for the organization, causes jealousy and lawsuits from the “unwilling” women. See Fox News. These lawsuits are nothing more than embarrassment avoidance settlement payment machines.

The “unwilling” women were not necessarily harassed or molested. If they were, it’s criminal and they need to seek charges.

Harvey Weinstein is evil. But we need to separate the criminal behavior from the business decision maker behavior. Women need to blame other women for their influence on the decision makers.


2 posted on 10/14/2017 6:09:49 PM PDT by cicero2k
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

Hell no they aren’t going to return them. Whinestein is their Hollowoody Georgie Soros.


3 posted on 10/14/2017 6:13:53 PM PDT by FlingWingFlyer (Has Sheila JACKSON LEE changed her name yet?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cicero2k

I don’t see how returning “tainted” money helps. It mainly benefits Weinstein. Better to burn it than to give it back.


4 posted on 10/14/2017 6:33:22 PM PDT by AZLiberty (The logical endpoint of "zero-tolerance history" is zero history.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

The DNC will probably issue a statement that a decision will be made sometime in the future. Meaning never.


5 posted on 10/14/2017 6:40:01 PM PDT by laplata (Liberals/Progressives have diseased minds.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

Team Evil


6 posted on 10/14/2017 6:42:54 PM PDT by samadams2000 (Someone important make......The Call!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AZLiberty

it gets the smell off their hands.

if they do like clinton says she will donate it - to what “charity” clinton family slush find charity? some leftist, socialist, or wacked out women’s lib org?

I think also spiritually it shows God a person honestly wants a re-do, a reset back to before the money was received and let God take it from their to bless them His way.


7 posted on 10/14/2017 6:47:14 PM PDT by b4me (God Bless the USA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: cicero2k

“But we need to separate the criminal behavior from the business decision maker behavior. Women need to blame other women for their influence on the decision makers.”

Balzy post, but SPOT ON!


8 posted on 10/14/2017 7:08:44 PM PDT by BobL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

ANTIFA will be well funded by the time the Dems get done “returning (ha,ha)” all the money they collected in their war on women.


9 posted on 10/14/2017 7:12:13 PM PDT by Lurkina.n.Learnin (Wisdom and education are different things. Don't confuse them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

Perez had better keep the Weinstein money for bail. He’s going down, esp. if there is a federal investigation of Casa de Maryland.

See if James Jim Simpson’s massive study on that leftist group is on the internet or go to www.USAsurvival.org and check for it there.

It is full of surprises and possible criminal activities under Perez.


10 posted on 10/14/2017 7:21:51 PM PDT by MadMax, the Grinning Reaper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

bttt


11 posted on 10/14/2017 7:29:51 PM PDT by timestax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cicero2k

Your post was insightful. Thank you for it.

‘Pod


12 posted on 10/14/2017 7:41:03 PM PDT by sauropod (I am His and He is Mine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

DNC is too broke to return that much money ...


13 posted on 10/14/2017 7:41:21 PM PDT by catnipman ( Cat Nipman: Vote Republican in 2012 and only be called racist one more time!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

Depends on who he was with at their headquarters. I wouldn’t want it.

rwood


14 posted on 10/14/2017 7:57:43 PM PDT by Redwood71
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: markomalley
..."I don't take questions like this," Ellison said.

This is what democracy looks like.

15 posted on 10/14/2017 8:09:54 PM PDT by Libloather (Trivial Pursuit question - name the first female to lose TWO presidential elections!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: markomalley
How much money did Harvey contriute over the past 25 years?

Give is ALL back!

16 posted on 10/14/2017 9:37:52 PM PDT by Cowboy Bob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson