Skip to comments.
MSNBC Nicolle Wallace: 2nd Amend Intended To Fight Foreign Militias Not Create Armed Population
bluntforcetruth.com ^
| 10/11/2017
| unknown
Posted on 10/11/2017 9:09:44 AM PDT by rktman
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-76 next last
To: rktman; pepsionice
What is she talking about? The most recent USSC rulings make clear the 2A is an individual right. That ends the old canard the lefties used to push about it being a collective “militia” right.
She changed the old arguments slightly, saying the militia refers to foreign militias but I am not sure how anyone can read that interpretation from the 2As “well regulated militia” but as pepsionice mentioned above even if you did read it that way it simply supports the notion that the people need to be armed.
To: GOPJ
Exactly. When the 2nd was drafted, we already had an army, viz. the Continental Army. The "militia" was separate from that. The "militia" was an armed citizenry, armed with the same weapons as government troops.
The gun control acts of '34, '68, and '86 have largely neutered the Founding Father's intent.
42
posted on
10/11/2017 9:29:59 AM PDT
by
LouAvul
(The most High ruleth in the kingdom of men, and giveth it to whomsoever he will.)
To: N. Theknow
> Foreign militias like Antifa and BLM?More like the DNC and thier fifth columnists MSNBC ...
43
posted on
10/11/2017 9:30:57 AM PDT
by
SecondAmendment
(Restoring our Republic at 9.8357x10^8 FPS)
To: rktman
She is sooooooo wrong.
It’s about hunting.
;-)
44
posted on
10/11/2017 9:31:43 AM PDT
by
robroys woman
(So you're not confused, I'm male.)
To: rktman
45
posted on
10/11/2017 9:32:07 AM PDT
by
Bratch
("The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing." - Edmund Burke)
To: backwoods-engineer
Ditto.
I no longer discuss Second Amendment with leftist gun grabbers. I just say we have them, we know how to use them, and we are quite willing to use them. Do you think you have what it takes to come and get them?
That usually concludes the dialogue on the subject.
46
posted on
10/11/2017 9:32:15 AM PDT
by
ChildOfThe60s
(If you can remember the 60's....You weren't really there)
To: rktman
Probably taught that in public school like most millennials who know not much about the greatness of America but lots about doom and gloom .
47
posted on
10/11/2017 9:32:26 AM PDT
by
Lionheartusa1
()-: There is nothing democratic about the democrat party :-()
To: rktman
Just need to ask her one question.
What counts as a foreign militia airhead?
Why do people think that they’re authorities on a subject because they read the newspaper this week?
48
posted on
10/11/2017 9:32:34 AM PDT
by
Skywise
To: Lurkinanloomin
there was little conservative about Bush I or Bush II.
The alternatives were Clinton and Gore. What else could we have done? Perot had revealed himself to either be unhinged or not serious about winning. If he had been the Trump Phenomenon would have occurred a quarter-century ago.
To: All
Box of rocks called, it wants it brains back..
50
posted on
10/11/2017 9:36:13 AM PDT
by
newnhdad
(Our new motto: USA, it was fun while it lasted.)
To: rktman
Foreign militias...like an Obama regime.
51
posted on
10/11/2017 9:37:15 AM PDT
by
JimRed
( TERM LIMITS, NOW! Build the Wall Faster! TRUTH is the new HATE SPEECH.)
To: BuffaloJack
Be careful asking such questions — Many leftists take “How stupid?” as a challenge.
52
posted on
10/11/2017 9:37:26 AM PDT
by
Bob
(Damn, the democrats haven't been this upset since Republicans freed their slaves.)
To: rktman
And this is why the uninfringed possession of weapons by the people is necessary

No licensing and no registration.
53
posted on
10/11/2017 9:38:12 AM PDT
by
fella
("As it was before Noah so shall it be again,")
To: rktman
Another noted constituional scholar weighs in.
54
posted on
10/11/2017 9:38:45 AM PDT
by
IronJack
To: rktman
Gun grabbers say the stupidest things ...
55
posted on
10/11/2017 9:39:09 AM PDT
by
NorthMountain
(... the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed)
To: N. Theknow
Or the hordes coming across our southern borders on a nightly basis.
56
posted on
10/11/2017 9:39:40 AM PDT
by
L,TOWM
(I don't have a preference for politician or a party. I have God and His standards.)
To: Buckeye McFrog
It was intentional that we have no choice.
Since the last amnesty the GOP only nominated amnesty/open borders presidential candidates until Trump broke through the blockade set up to keep us from stopping the illegal alien inundation.
If Trump had run in 1988, we might have been spared a tremendous amount.
Perot was the wrong candidate.
57
posted on
10/11/2017 9:42:10 AM PDT
by
Lurkinanloomin
(Natural Born Citizen Means Born Here Of Citizen Parents - Know Islam, No Peace -No Islam, Know Peace)
To: ChildOfThe60s
You wanna hear some real cricket chirping, ask the constitutional experts to explain to you how “the people” mentioned in the 1st, 4th, 9th, and 10th amendments are different than “the people” mentioned in the 2nd amendment.
It usually get really quiet after that. Sometimes, you even get the whiff of burning meat and smoke coming out of their ears as they try to come up with something. It can be fun.
58
posted on
10/11/2017 9:44:32 AM PDT
by
L,TOWM
(I don't have a preference for politician or a party. I have God and His standards.)
To: rktman
Before a standing army can rule, the people must be disarmed; as they are in almost every kingdom of Europe. The supreme power in America cannot enforce unjust laws by the sword;
because the whole body of people are armed, and constitute a force superior to any body of regular troops that can be, on any pretense, raised in the United States
-- Noah Webster, An Examination into the Leading Principals of the Federal Constitution
59
posted on
10/11/2017 9:53:37 AM PDT
by
Sgt_Schultze
(When your business model depends on slave labor, you're always going to need more slaves.)
To: rktman
Perhaps she should read a history books. We won that war because armed men (not belonging to a state militia) joined in the fight for freedom. Equally as important Jefferson wanted an armed populace to keep an eye on the government.
60
posted on
10/11/2017 10:10:59 AM PDT
by
New Jersey Realist
( (Be Nice To Your Kids. They Will Pick Out Your Nursing Home))
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-76 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson