Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

New York Times Released Harvey Weinstein Bombshell to Bury O’Keefe’s Damaging Undercover Video
The Gateway Pundit ^ | October 10, 2017 | Cristina Laila

Posted on 10/10/2017 3:23:40 PM PDT by Bratch

It appears The New York Times released the Harvey Weinstein story in order to bury the O’Keefe bombshell report exposing the failing paper.


 

In a video announcement released on September 18th, Project Veritas founder and guerrilla journalist James O’Keefe warned his organization was currently operating one of the biggest ever investigations into the mainstream media’s ‘holy grail,’ promising media people will likely lose their jobs over the imminent exposé.

O’Keefe hinted he was targeting the New York Times in a cryptic tweet he sent out on August 7th.

Stay tuned... https://t.co/uBTqwMeSDC

  — James O'Keefe (@JamesOKeefeIII) August 8, 2017

On October 4th, James O’Keefe tweeted, “NEXT WEEK: Our next groundbreaking #AmericanPravda video targets the holy grail of the MSM. Undercover ops still in the field… Stay tuned.”

NEXT WEEK: Our next groundbreaking #AmericanPravda video targets the holy grail of the MSM. Undercover ops still in the field…

Stay tuned.

  — James O'Keefe (@JamesOKeefeIII) October 4, 2017

The very next day on October 5th, The New York Times blew the roof off of the decades long ‘open secret’ in Hollywood that Harvey Weinstein was essentially a sexual predator who preyed on young starlets. Weinstein reportedly paid off several sexual harassment accusers over the years.

An investigation by The New York Times found previously undisclosed allegations against Mr. Weinstein stretching over nearly three decades, documented through interviews with current and former employees and film industry workers, as well as legal records, emails and internal documents from the businesses he has run, Miramax and the Weinstein Company.

During that time, after being confronted with allegations including sexual harassment and unwanted physical contact, Mr. Weinstein has reached at least eight settlements with women, according to two company officials speaking on the condition of anonymity.

The New York Times had the story all the way back in 2004 and squashed it after Weinstein himself appeared at the NYT headquarters and muscled the paper into silence, so now all of a sudden they are eager to throw the producer under the bus and open the flood gates? The timing is very suspicious.

Since this bombshell story was published last Thursday, there has been a slow drip of stories on Weinstein.

On Tuesday morning at around the exact same time O’Keefe dropped his damaging undercover video of The New York Times, the paper dropped a huge story on Weinstein which included Gwyneth Paltrow and Angelina Jolie

The story was so big that it dominated the Drudge Report’s most coveted space–his headline–in HUGE red letters. Underneath the headline in red is O’Keefe’s story.

If the New York Times hadn’t dropped the bombshell that Gwyneth Paltrow and Angelina Jolie were now speaking out about Weinstein’s harassment on top of The New Yorker’s story alleging he raped three women, certainly O’Keefe’s story would be dominating Drudge’s headline. (screenshot below)

 

There is no such thing as coincidences is politics. The New York Times had to distract the media cycle with a story that had the possibility of eclipsing a James O’Keefe bombshell undercover video.

This only proves how powerful Project Veritas and alternative media have become.

Expect more Weinstein bombs to drop as Veritas releases more footage of the New York Times.


TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: harveyweinstein; jamesokeefe; nyt
Speculation...but definitely not beyond the realms of possibility.
1 posted on 10/10/2017 3:23:40 PM PDT by Bratch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Bratch

Will the next bombshell involve Corey Feldman????


2 posted on 10/10/2017 3:28:08 PM PDT by lizma2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bratch

...except that I don’t think that the Times released it. I believe it was released by Project Veritas or maybe even One America News? (that’s where I saw it)


3 posted on 10/10/2017 3:28:33 PM PDT by Zarro (Oh, we don't call them the "MSM" any longer; they are now the "Basket of Detestables")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bratch

This makes me suspicious of Drudge as well. It’s obvious to anyone what the more important story really is. Although Drudge does have a Hollywood bias.


4 posted on 10/10/2017 3:29:12 PM PDT by Vic S
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bratch

I doubt it. Much easier for the NYT to just dump this lying little weasel and sacrifice one low-level staffer than to expose Weinstein. There are much more compelling theories around, including that his brother was after control of the company.


5 posted on 10/10/2017 3:31:57 PM PDT by bigbob (People say believe half of what you see son and none of what you hear - M. Gaye)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lizma2

Cory Haim

Did either of them ever work in His films?


6 posted on 10/10/2017 3:40:09 PM PDT by ncfool (America Reborn 1/20/2017. Lets make sure we don't screw up,the opportunity to MAGA.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ncfool

Was thinking about this article.

http://cernovich.com/flashback-pedophiles-hollywood-exposed-elijah-wood-corey-feldman/


7 posted on 10/10/2017 4:20:54 PM PDT by lizma2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Bratch

All of the NYT is anti Trump. This clown was unfortunately for him, busted. NYT will have to address this continuing and rampant “journalistic” malfeasance.


8 posted on 10/10/2017 4:24:58 PM PDT by Sasparilla ( I'm Not Tired of Winning.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sasparilla

Drudge did Monica after others spiked the report.


9 posted on 10/10/2017 4:39:59 PM PDT by DIRTYSECRET (urope. Why do they put up with this.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: DIRTYSECRET

This is like the NFL excrement! It’s not that nobody cares. I’m enjoying it! No need for input.


10 posted on 10/10/2017 4:43:17 PM PDT by DIRTYSECRET (urope. Why do they put up with this.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Bratch

This I believe to be true


11 posted on 10/10/2017 5:22:54 PM PDT by Nifster (I see puppy dogs in the clouds)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bratch

Squirrel!


12 posted on 10/10/2017 5:26:41 PM PDT by XEHRpa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bratch

There’s NO WAY we could keep track of both stories at once!!

/sarc


13 posted on 10/10/2017 5:56:47 PM PDT by Dr. Pritchett
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson