Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: kabar
Dan, you are delusional. The demographic make-up of Houston or CA results in Dem control.

Possibly I am delusional

1. most people with a STEM background, engineers particularly will tell you that "Figures lie and Liers figure"

So in the Houston Mayoral runoff - with about 100,000 people voting your STATISTICS have no value, the stats themselves may very well be accurate but of no value in any given election. This past election cycle had STATISTICALLY Dem. states give more votes to Trump.

2. Venezuela - Were the people there in 1996 when they voted in Chavez delusional, are they delusional today, now that they can see first hand what Communism looks like. Things I fully remember from my childhood in Communist Czechoslovakia

Oh, and by the way - Does that make me a Communist-Slovak-american?

3. Some recent columns out of California - Some locals in L.A. (Not lower Alabama-:) ) and San Francisco are complaining that there is a lack of affordable restaurants. Gee, the Statistics of Dems favoring "livable wages" for are astronomical, I wonder why these individual Dems. who as a collective are statistically morons, do not spend their non-existent $$ on paying "Living Wages" to the suffering restaurant workers.

Oh, and another category of new Dem. talking points - no, not really new - Sex workers - I know no one here would call a Whore a Sex Worker - well, except maybe for Hillary and Harvey W.

64 posted on 10/08/2017 9:19:29 AM PDT by DanZ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies ]


To: DanZ
So in the Houston Mayoral runoff - with about 100,000 people voting your STATISTICS have no value, the stats themselves may very well be accurate but of no value in any given election.

The stats have value because they are a representative sample of the voting population as a whole. They have value just as much if not more than a poll. FYI: The Dems have controlled the office of mayor in Houston since 1982.

This past election cycle had STATISTICALLY Dem. states give more votes to Trump.

That makes no sense. Hillary received 3 million more votes than Trump. There were a few states like WI, PA, and MI, that saw Trump garner more votes, Dem and otherwise, than was previously the case. The top three popular), and voter totals in history are Obama (2008), Obama (2012), and Hillary (2016).

2. Venezuela - Were the people there in 1996 when they voted in Chavez delusional, are they delusional today, now that they can see first hand what Communism looks like. Things I fully remember from my childhood in Communist Czechoslovakia Oh, and by the way - Does that make me a Communist-Slovak-american?

Are you off your meds? What connection does the results of Venezuelan elections have to do with what we are discussing re the demographic impact on election results?

3. Some recent columns out of California - Some locals in L.A. (Not lower Alabama-:) ) and San Francisco are complaining that there is a lack of affordable restaurants. Gee, the Statistics of Dems favoring "livable wages" for are astronomical, I wonder why these individual Dems. who as a collective are statistically morons, do not spend their non-existent $$ on paying "Living Wages" to the suffering restaurant workers.

LA and SF will remain overwhelmingly in control of the Dems just like the entire state.

Oh, and another category of new Dem. talking points - no, not really new - Sex workers - I know no one here would call a Whore a Sex Worker - well, except maybe for Hillary and Harvey W.

You shouldn't be drinking so early in the day.

73 posted on 10/08/2017 11:45:55 AM PDT by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson