Posted on 10/07/2017 3:16:14 PM PDT by bitt
Lawyers for Imran Awan, an ex-aide who ran information technology (IT) for Democratic Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz, “feel very strongly” that data recovered from a hard drive on Capitol Hill should not be valid as evidence because he put a note that said “attorney client privilege” near it before leaving it in a phone booth, they said in federal court Friday. A police report shows that the backpack contained a laptop with the username “RepDWS,” copy of Imran Awan’s ID, and the notebook.
Prosecutors revealed that when they arrested Imran at the airport in July as he tried to board a flight to Pakistan, he was carrying a resume with an alias in the Jackson Heights, Queens neighborhood of New York City. Imran may have planned to “relocate” there, seemingly under a different identity, Prosecutors suggested. They said he had wiped his cell phone hours before the arrest, suggesting that he was taking “active measures” to hide evidence.
(Excerpt) Read more at dailycaller.com ...
PING TO LIZ’S COMMENT #58:
To the casual observer, their arguments are just plain ludicrous. I mean a note on the laptop claiming attorney-client privilege?
Asinine.
Yet Imran and his edgy lawyers are almost paranoic, moving hell and high water to prevent the contents of the laptop Imran left in a phone booth from seeing the light of day.
We can safely conclude the laptop under dispute is highly evidentiary and contains intricate details that Imran, Debbie and Democrat IT employers are loathed to have revealed.
Debbie Wassermann Schultz, herself, went ballistic. She told two diametrically different stories about the laptop: first she said she owned it and threatened Capitol Hill Police w/ “consequences” if she didn’t get it back. She then turned tail and said she never saw it before....it belonged to Imran.
The contents of the laptop must contain all the printed (not heresay) evidence judges and juries love to have to convict defendants.
<><> List of wire-transfers (tax dollars Imran sent to Pakistan).
<><> Lists of Democrats’ numbered offshore bank accounts.
<><> Lists of Imran’s multiple identities.
<><>Lists of ghost employees cashing US govt checks Imran put on Democrats’ payrolls.
<><> Instructions on how to falsify official govt forms.
<><> Names and addresses of co-conspirators.
<><>Details of conspiracies to steal tax dollars.
<><> The significant financial details.
<><> Details of the various cover-ups.
<><> Scope and dimension of US intel now in the hands of America’s global enemies.
RATS, forgot to add the ping list -
PING TO #58 LIZ’S COMMENT
To the casual observer, their arguments are just plain ludicrous. I mean a note on the laptop claiming attorney-client privilege?
Asinine.
Yet Imran and his edgy lawyers are almost paranoic, moving hell and high water to prevent the contents of the laptop Imran left in a phone booth from seeing the light of day.
We can safely conclude the laptop under dispute is highly evidentiary and contains intricate details that Imran, Debbie and Democrat IT employers are loathed to have revealed.
Debbie Wassermann Schultz, herself, went ballistic. She told two diametrically different stories about the laptop: first she said she owned it and threatened Capitol Hill Police w/ “consequences” if she didn’t get it back. She then turned tail and said she never saw it before....it belonged to Imran.
The contents of the laptop must contain all the printed (not heresay) evidence judges and juries love to have to convict defendants.
<><> List of wire-transfers (tax dollars Imran sent to Pakistan).
<><> Lists of Democrats’ numbered offshore bank accounts.
<><> Lists of Imran’s multiple identities.
<><>Lists of ghost employees cashing US govt checks Imran put on Democrats’ payrolls.
<><> Instructions on how to falsify official govt forms.
<><> Names and addresses of co-conspirators.
<><>Details of conspiracies to steal tax dollars.
<><> The significant financial details.
<><> Details of the various cover-ups.
<><> Scope and dimension of US intel now in the hands of America’s global enemies.
Awan used an alias. That is not what they are hiding. It is the alias from others that will cause the problems. DWS, Huma, Hillary all used alias. No one will ever see these computer records.
Phone booth for sale:
You’re welcome.
The James Dean standee is included. I’m so relieved!
perhaps if Awan rolls over, we’ll get the story.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.