>> But Clarence Thomas is criticized by the same people for not asking anything during oral arguments proving his sub-par intellect and legal skills - or at least according to the libs.<<
Yet I’ve read commentary on Justice Thomas praising him for writing many of the clearest and most constitutionally cogent opinions coming out of the SCUS.
His dissent to Gonzales v Raich, aka The Commerce Clause decision, is devastating to the majority opinion. Which means nothing, but felt good.