Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

China’s Giant New Cruiser Matches America’s Naval Firepower
War is Boring ^ | October 5, 2017 | David Axe

Posted on 10/05/2017 12:25:45 PM PDT by sukhoi-30mki

Chinese state television has broadcast the first clear, overhead view of the Chinese navy’s first Type 055 cruiser. The image confirms what foreign analysts have expected since the new cruiser began taking shape in 2014.

The Type 055 carries no fewer than 122 missiles in vertical cells — any mix of anti-air, anti-ship and land-attack models. That matches the weapons-loadout of the U.S. Navy’s Ticonderoga-class cruisers … and exceeds the armament of every other surface warship in the Pacific region.

The new cruiser could enter service as early as 2018.

The Type 055 — which is an estimate 590 feet long and displaces at least 10,000 tons — represents a new class of warship for the Chinese navy. When Beijing launched its naval rearmament program in the 1990s, it focused on building large numbers of small- and medium-size corvettes, frigates and destroyers.

USS Lake Champlain, a Ticonderoga-class cruiser. U.S. Navy photo

These surface vessels patrol the Chinese coast, sail independently or in small groups to deter pirates in the Indian Ocean or act as escorts for China’s new amphibious assault ships and the country’s — so far — sole aircraft carrier, the refurbished, ex-Russian Liaoning.

Prior to the Type 055, the biggest surface combatant in the Chinese fleet was the 7,500-ton-displacement Type o52D destroyer, six of which were in service and several others fitting out as of October 2017. A Type 052D carries 64 missiles in vertical cells.

For comparison, the U.S. Navy’s 9,600-ton Arleigh Burke-class destroyers boast as many as 96 missile cells. Japan’s Atago-class destroyers, displacing 10,000 tons, also feature 96 cells. The 11,500-ton Russian cruiser Varyag, the biggest vessel in Moscow’s Pacific fleet, carries 120 missiles.

With the Type 055, China has caught up to, or surpassed, the other Pacific powers in terms of sheer seagoing firepower. Per ship. But the Chinese fleet still lags behind the United States and barely exceeds Japan in the overall number of seagoing vertical missile cells, a useful shorthand for naval power.

China’s 39 modern destroyers and frigates — not counting the Type 055 — together can deploy around 1,500 cells. The U.S. Pacific Fleet’s 36 Burkes and 12 Ticonderogas together possess nearly 5,000 missile cells. Japan’s 19 modern destroyers carry around 1,000 cells, combined.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Japan; News/Current Events; Russia
KEYWORDS: china; clinton; cruiser; type055; warship
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-25 last
To: central_va

China’s shipbuilding capacity, for warships, is less than either the US or Japan.

They have a ways to catch up.

With effort, they could. And both the US and Japan could significantly increase too.

The technology gap is still significant too. Our stuff is better across the board. And the Japanese get access to any and all of it.


21 posted on 10/05/2017 3:09:42 PM PDT by Mariner (Pink Pussy Hats for the NFL)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

Thanks to the free traitors, yet another Chinese weapon system we paid for.


22 posted on 10/05/2017 3:47:22 PM PDT by TwelveOfTwenty (Prayers for our country and President Trump)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

#1 is still South Korea’s Sejong the Great-class destroyers with 128


23 posted on 10/05/2017 5:41:17 PM PDT by Oztrich Boy (Winter is coming)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: central_va

“With vertical launch you get egg roll.”

Now that’s funny right there! I have a Chinese coworker who has a sticker on her cubicle that says, “Cat, the other white meat.”

Says she, “loves cat, it’s pretty good.”

Thanks for the laugh!


24 posted on 10/05/2017 9:17:31 PM PDT by Bshaw (A nefarious deceit is upon us all!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Mariner
Our warship construction capacity sucks. Our industrial base is on steep decline and we have one dry dock that can be ued for CVN repair and construction. You might want to rethink what you said.

This is blow back fro the handiwork of the Free Traitor™ that has no allegiance except to corporate profit.

25 posted on 10/06/2017 4:38:43 AM PDT by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-25 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson