Posted on 10/03/2017 6:43:15 PM PDT by Eddie01
Though the FBI stated the day after the attack that Las Vegas mass-murderer Stephen Paddock had "no connection" with international terror groups, on Tuesday evening, US President Donald Trump undercut that assessment, telling reporters aboard Air Force One "I have no idea" whether the killer is linked to Daesh.
[snip]
(Excerpt) Read more at sputniknews.com ...
Please read my comments 94, 95 and 100, in this regard.
Oops....
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/bloggers/3591497/posts?page=94#94
And...The clowns were competent at their jobs.
Has anyone heard what kind of aircraft Paddock owned?. I heard two or three. Curious as there has been no reference to the type other than “small aircraft”.
A similar case down in Arkansas under the Clinton adminsstration.
A mass murder attacks people in Washington or Oregon. Two dead. Clinton calls for “MORE GUN CONTROL!”
Meanwhile, at the same time down in Arkansas, two people near here are kidnapped, taken to Missouri and have their throats cut. No mention by the Clintons.
FBI looks into the case, finds a perp and lots of CASH wrapped in cellophane, sends the money to the FBI lab with instructions to check the wrap for fingerprints.
Idiots at the FBI lab take off the wrap, discard it and look at the money, ruining any evidence.
Perp walks due to FBI incompetence.
Then there is that Angela Davis debacle over forty years ago in which they have a perfect case against her, and they screw it up and she walks.
Janet Reno died the day before the 2016 election.
I read it all.
I don’t see a lot of significance in there except..
ISIS did claim credit, and surprisingly they are not in the habit of falsely claiming credit.
People have researched it and there is only one possibly false claim and even that one is debatable.
Still one can see why any militant group would be eager to claim credit for things beyond they really did, to boost their rep and demoralize opponent.
Despite the lack of false claims of credit, I don’t see this as “proof” or even very good evidence.
But it isn’t nothing either.
I humbly admit I know nothing but am open to possibilities.
I read on another site with some people who are very knowledgeable about Islam and jihad, and apparently ISIS never claims any action unless they’re really involved. I also considered that excerpt from what the sheriff said that the shooter had been “radicalized”. So that leaves basically two choices - serious Antifa-ism/commiepukedom, or Islamic jihad. Or a mixture, they’re hand in hand at this point.
Hopefully we’ll find out what the deal is.
“The shooter was a left-wing radical anti-Trump supporter.
Or A muslim.
Only 2 choices”
3rd option and the one I’d be willing to bet on at this point:
S.S.R.I.’s
S.S.R.I.s"
~~~~~~~~~
That is one long-term fixation -- with massive expenditures, equipment gathering and modification plus serious long-term planning -- to be a SSRI effect/affect.
Various parts of this don’t add up and details have changed over time. Count me very skeptical of any official explanations. I am not even that convinced that Paddock was a willing participant, a gun collector on this scale, or motivated to kill dozens of people. Are you?
and yet the FBI was comfortable coming out in less than 24 hours after the mass murder and said “no ties”. Either FBI/CIA runs ISIS and knows who is and isn’t on their payroll, or they’re liars/incompetent.
Lets be clear in order to keep our site with some credibility. The sheriff never said that Paddock had been radicalized. He said Paddock may have been radicalized, unbeknownst to them, and they want to know that source (of the radicalization). This was in response to why they were taking their time collecting evidence and finding motive etc.
They are starting to admit to the truth now:
https://www.infowars.com/breaking-sheriff-says-las-vegas-shooter-could-have-been-radicalized/
Koresh was available for arrest outside the compound, but the elected idiots prefer a good show.
Yep - and he refuses to fall into a trap as different entities try to obfuscate/complicate the real facts about the sick puppy who did this.
Let’s see,
He failure of the fbi to indict the clintons and their “foundation”.
The failure of the fbi to go after any politician who is obviously doing illegal shit, mr obamma.
Waco
Ruby ridge.
The list of the fbi being horse crap goes on and on.
Trust the fbi?
You gots to be joking right?
He provided the only correct answer, at this point.
The FBIs Director. Does he ever make any announcements? Does he do any work? Does he show up for work?
I agree a 3rd option involving both together.
Have no clue what SSRI means
Thank you for the clarification.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.