Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: C19fan
In engineering, we *NEVER* wanted take-home, or open-book tests. Ever. Would look at anyone who wanted that as a fool.

Why? Because the profs would see to it that they were near-impossible. You'd spend far, far more time, and have far less chance of passing, a takehome/openbook test. Just rip the Band-Aid off and get it over with, was a far better test taking strategy.

Of course, those were in real classes, where we actually earned grades, and had a real (70% or better) chance of flunking out. They weren't "fill-in-the-blank studies", or whatever passes for SJW snowflake school nowadays.

20 posted on 10/02/2017 11:58:50 AM PDT by wbill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: wbill

I remember my final in a semiconductor physics class. It was part in-class closed book and part take home. The in-class was relatively painless. The take home took well over a day (24+ hrs) to complete.


31 posted on 10/02/2017 12:11:34 PM PDT by NewHampshireDuo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

To: wbill

“Because the profs would see to it that they were near-impossible. You’d spend far, far more time, and have far less chance of passing, a takehome/openbook test. “

I remember my linear equations class had a take-home mid-term exam that resulted in answers that were 24 pages written. The final was 20 pages written. I would rather have had a simple 2 hour exam instead. Those exams were brutal.


54 posted on 10/02/2017 12:44:54 PM PDT by CodeToad (CWII is coming. Arm Up! They Are!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson