[LS]

Don’t know why this is a “bombshell.”

I reported here in January that Bannon said Trump woyldn’t go after Cankles and again in August that he daid they wouldn’t. “That looks like Banana Republic stuff to criminally go after the loser in an election.”

[little jeremiah]

I am not happy with this, if accurate. Why should serious crimes from people in the previous administration be ignored and swept under the rug, if there is sufficient evidence to convict?

Especially Benghazi.

Also not happy about 0bama’s fraudulent identity being glossed over.

Not happy with this at all.

Criminal acts are criminal acts.

[little jeremiah]

Adding - tooling around, I find the reactions to this to be very, very negative towards Trump.

And I think this is inevitable, it is going to rub off on Trump and not help his support at all.

[MileHi]

“That looks like Banana Republic stuff to criminally go after the loser in an election.”

I get that. Still, her crimes are legion. And "fast and furious" and the IRS have nothing to do with the election. Nor did Lynch, Comey, Rice or Power lose an election.