Actually Goldberg's position is more nuanced than that regarding Moore, but you have to skip/ignore the Gladiator stuff to get there.
He's essentially calling Moore a conservative religious bigot cloaking himself in populist rhetoric to appeal to Trump voters while pursuing his own agenda.
Luther Strange would have made a more reliable Trump ally.
Goldberg was destroying the once proud reputation of National Review long before Trump became a candidate for President. He’s a CINO and is the main reason I cancelled my subscription.
>> Goldberg’s position is more nuanced than that regarding Moore, but you have to skip/ignore the Gladiator stuff to get there <<
I’d say that’s a kinda naive comment, because it assumes that people have actually read the article. Trouble is, reading the articles is seriously frowned upon around here.