Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 09/29/2017 3:28:42 AM PDT by LibWhacker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: LibWhacker
where was the early warning device, or was the drone too small ?
2 posted on 09/29/2017 3:54:01 AM PDT by knarf (I say things that are true, I have no proof, but they're true.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LibWhacker

The drone pilot is aware of his altitude.

Helicopters are loud.

The drone pilot should drop altitude and return to launch point if he hears aircraft.

Not to mention the phone apps that tell you of FAA regulations, based on geographic location.


4 posted on 09/29/2017 4:00:20 AM PDT by cicero2k
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LibWhacker

The transmitters which operate the drones should be regulated and not have a range exceeding approximately 200 ft. Drones should also be required to automatically descend to ground level once contact with transmitting controller is lost.

This needs immediate attention before a passenger jet ingests one of these things on takeoff or landing.


7 posted on 09/29/2017 4:12:59 AM PDT by billyboy15
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LibWhacker

The helicopters were providing security for a meeting of the U.N. General Assembly,

Another waste of money and equipment.


8 posted on 09/29/2017 4:15:59 AM PDT by Mouton (The MSM is a clear and present danger to the republic.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LibWhacker

The helicopters were providing security for a meeting of the U.N. General Assembly,

Another waste of money and equipment.


9 posted on 09/29/2017 4:16:00 AM PDT by Mouton (The MSM is a clear and present danger to the republic.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LibWhacker

It won’t be the last time something like this happens.


13 posted on 09/29/2017 4:41:36 AM PDT by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LibWhacker

It’s only a matter of time before a drone causes a major accident and multiple deaths - accidentally or purposely.


15 posted on 09/29/2017 4:48:09 AM PDT by elpadre (AfganistaMr Obama said theoal was to "disrupt, dismantle and defeat al-hereQaeda" and its allies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LibWhacker

The drone is a 17”x17”x8” quadcopter and sells for $499 on Amazon. It comes with a HD video camera and has a flight time of up to 15 minutes. Also, the radio control is about 300 meters and if it gets out beyond that, it will return by GPS to its starting point.


16 posted on 09/29/2017 4:53:54 AM PDT by BuffaloJack (Men stand up for freedom; slaves kneel before their masters.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LibWhacker

For reference, the drone costs $1k and weighs 8.8 pounds, 15 x 8.7 x 12.8 inches. It’s a little bigger than a kids’ toy.


17 posted on 09/29/2017 4:55:36 AM PDT by Pollster1 ("Governments derive their just powers from the consent of the governed")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LibWhacker
Arterburn says the collision could have been much worse for the Black Hawk. “The way the [drone] hit them...was in somewhat of a benign orientation. I think they got fortunate.” It appears the drone hit the left side of the aircraft and bounced up into the retreating blade, where it was struck again. If it had hit an advancing blade, it could have done major damage, says Arterburn.

Mr. Arterburn needs to brush up on his helicopter dynamics.

There is nothing different about the advancing or retreating blade from a drone strike perspective. The relative velocities between the drone and the blade are identical.

The difference between the advancing and the retreating blade is only aerodynamic while in forward flight, where the apparent wind speed of the retreating blade is slower than that of the advancing blade, thus affecting the lift generated by the blade.

21 posted on 09/29/2017 5:04:04 AM PDT by Yo-Yo (Is the /sarc tag really necessary?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LibWhacker

Other than being easier to fly, a so-called drone, as the media likes to call them, is nothing more than a radio controlled aircraft; and radio controlled aircraft have been around for over 50 years. Perhaps people have less common sense now to avoid operating an R/C aircraft near real aircraft.


23 posted on 09/29/2017 5:05:49 AM PDT by Flick Lives
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LibWhacker

The civilian helicopter would have FARED much worse.

Do they teach English in journalism schools these days?


31 posted on 09/29/2017 5:31:41 AM PDT by IronJack (sh)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LibWhacker

Was it an Amazon delivery drone?


36 posted on 09/29/2017 7:06:07 AM PDT by bgill (CDC site, "We don't know how people are infected with Ebola.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LibWhacker

One of those little hand-sized drones, or something bigger?


38 posted on 09/29/2017 8:01:37 AM PDT by JimRed ( TERM LIMITS, NOW! Build the Wall Faster! TRUTH is the new HATE SPEECH.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LibWhacker

Yes, neither drones nor “air cars” in the future will be able to avoid or ignore “traffic lanes”.


40 posted on 09/29/2017 8:46:25 AM PDT by Wuli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson