Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Paladin2
Fewer brackets with higher steps between introduces more dysfunctional decision making. Fewer brackets is a YUGE mistake.

You do understand they are marginal brackets, not absolute brackets right? Let's say a married couple makes $200k today of taxable income (after all the deductions). Today (and rounding for simple math), the first 18k is taxed at 10%, then the next $60k is taxed at 15%, then the next 80k is taxed at 25% and then the next 47k is taxed at 28% (total fed due = $43k). In the new plan, it would be 12% on the first 78k, and 25% on the next $122k, or $40k in tax due, $3k less than today.

173 posted on 09/27/2017 2:17:37 PM PDT by rb22982
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]


To: rb22982

Yes I do.

At the cusp a larger step results in crazier decisions.

Better to have more but smaller steps (kinda like The Calculus).

It’s not like we don’t have PCs to sort it out and run scenarios for intelligent decision making.


177 posted on 09/27/2017 2:22:07 PM PDT by Paladin2 (No spelchk nor wrong word auto substition on mobile dev. Please be intelligent and deal with it....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 173 | View Replies ]

To: rb22982

True. But decisions are made on tax brackets income falls in. The larger the ‘jumps’ in rates, the more impact.

For example, in deciding to withdraw from retirement accounts, a jump from 15% to 25% make it a bigger decision than a jump from 25% to 28%.


178 posted on 09/27/2017 2:23:09 PM PDT by TexasGator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 173 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson