Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: circlecity
Thus, he will be against any legislation the furthers safe and responsible gun ownership and use for hunters, recreational shooters or anyone else.

As we should all be, because any legislation that "furthers safe and responsible gun ownership and use for hunters, recreational shooters or anyone else" infringes on the God-given right acknowledged in the second amendment.

11 posted on 09/20/2017 7:07:24 AM PDT by JimRed ( TERM LIMITS, NOW! Building the Wall! TRUTH is the new HATE SPEECH.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]


To: JimRed
"As we should all be, because any legislation that "furthers safe and responsible gun ownership and use for hunters, recreational shooters or anyone else" infringes on the God-given right acknowledged in the second amendment."

Not true. Govt. grants of financial assistance to provide gun safety classes, State supported gun ranges (like we have in Indiana), Greater opening of public lands for use by hunters, allowing suppressors to help with noise pollution and hearing protection (like they do in Europe) are all ways the govt. could help support gun owners and protect their second amendment rights. Whether this would be a constitutional or prudent use of taxpayer monies is a legitimate but different question.

12 posted on 09/20/2017 8:14:32 AM PDT by circlecity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson