Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Pinkbell
The US government publicly announced in October that it was "confident" Russia orchestrated the hacking of the Democratic National Committee in the lead-up to the election.

It has been 11 months since that announcement and still not the tiniest shred of evidence has been produced.

32 posted on 09/19/2017 10:50:06 AM PDT by TigersEye (0bama. The Legacy is a lie. The lie is the Legacy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: TigersEye
It has been 11 months since that announcement and still not the tiniest shred of evidence has been produced.

Multiple sources have now produced evidence that the Russians hacking the DNC was utter bullsh*t from the beginning.

Liberal magazine "The New Republic" had an investigator look into the data breech from the DNC, and they noticed something about the bulk data released by Wiki leaks. The files contain time stamps, and when the entire block of data is examined, it becomes apparent that the Data was transferred at a rate of 23 megabits per second.

Well guess what? 23 megabits per second is impossible through the DNC's internet connection. They tested it. A man located 20 miles away could do no better than 11 megabits per second. Experts in the industry point out that an international internet connection wouldn't even be that fast. A Data transfer rate of 23 megabits per second could only have been transferred directly off of the network by a machine that was physically attached to the network. 23 megabits per second is the normal transfer speed between a desktop computer and a USB memory stick.

Experts (and might I add they were hired by a liberal company that very badly wanted to find proof of hacking) concluded that the data breech was an insider, and could not possibly have been accomplished through the internet.

This is why the media people have mostly shut up their lying mouths about "Russia hacking the election." They have been made aware that the data was transferred by an insider, and that the Russian angle is an obvious lie.

They don't want to talk about it anymore because it might shine a light on the body of Seth Rich, whom Wikileaks has virtually came out and said was their insider who sent them the data.

So yeah, the "Russians hacked the DNC" is a complete fabrication created by Hillary, and there never was any evidence that it happened in the first place.

43 posted on 09/19/2017 11:31:16 AM PDT by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson