Posted on 09/19/2017 10:06:45 AM PDT by Pinkbell
My understanding is that EVEN IF Trump colluded with Russia, IT IS NOT ILLEGAL FOR HIM TO HAVE DONE SO. In any case, I do not believe Trump engaged in such activity. If he DID we would've seen CLEAR evidence of that by now DUE TO LEAKS, LEAKS, LEAKS, LEAKS AND MORE LEAKS BUT NO LEAKS INDICATING TRUMP COLLUDED WITH RUSSIA.
Mueller is a deep state operative put to the task of SPYING ON THE TRUMP ADMINISTRATION UNDER THE GUISE OF INVESTIGATING COLLUSION WITH RUSSIA. Mueller is a SPY FOR THE DEEP STATE AND THAT'S ALL HE IS.
FOAD, Mueller, and Rosenstein, and McMaster.
Obviously these people never watched Rocky and Bullwinkle. If they did they would know this has been going on for 70 years. So what else is new?
Multiple sources have now produced evidence that the Russians hacking the DNC was utter bullsh*t from the beginning.
Liberal magazine "The New Republic" had an investigator look into the data breech from the DNC, and they noticed something about the bulk data released by Wiki leaks. The files contain time stamps, and when the entire block of data is examined, it becomes apparent that the Data was transferred at a rate of 23 megabits per second.
Well guess what? 23 megabits per second is impossible through the DNC's internet connection. They tested it. A man located 20 miles away could do no better than 11 megabits per second. Experts in the industry point out that an international internet connection wouldn't even be that fast. A Data transfer rate of 23 megabits per second could only have been transferred directly off of the network by a machine that was physically attached to the network. 23 megabits per second is the normal transfer speed between a desktop computer and a USB memory stick.
Experts (and might I add they were hired by a liberal company that very badly wanted to find proof of hacking) concluded that the data breech was an insider, and could not possibly have been accomplished through the internet.
This is why the media people have mostly shut up their lying mouths about "Russia hacking the election." They have been made aware that the data was transferred by an insider, and that the Russian angle is an obvious lie.
They don't want to talk about it anymore because it might shine a light on the body of Seth Rich, whom Wikileaks has virtually came out and said was their insider who sent them the data.
So yeah, the "Russians hacked the DNC" is a complete fabrication created by Hillary, and there never was any evidence that it happened in the first place.
Abbey can stay.
Agree. Very well stated.
Russia DID try to influence the election but they did so to help HILLARY get elected, not Trump.
The people whom you have evidence of illegality on are the ones that you TRY to get elected. For example, China-Clinton. The Trump-Russian narrative doesn’t support this.
None of the deleted or damaging Hillary emails besides DNC or Podesta ones have surfaced suggesting people that have them like the FBI or enemies want to leverage them.
Didn’t she delete over 30,000 of them? I am going out on a limb her but I think Russia HAS these deleted emails. If they were trying to damage her, why didn’t they leak them? Russia like almost everyone else expected Hillary to win which would put them in the catbird seat.
But think of other Russian interests.
They would like us to remove tactical nukes from Europe.
They would like us to let the military deteriorate.
They would like us to NOT develop our energy resources. A drop in oil price would have a massive impact on Russia economically.
They would not want us to build up our military intelligence.
They would not want us to develop our military technology.
They would not want us to be secure from terrorist attacks.
On each and every one of these issues, the candidate the Russians would NOT want to get elected would be Donald Trump.
I think most people who believe this story was falsified by a politicized intel community instinctively know this, but I think it is worthwhile to state it unequivocally.
As well as Julian Assange’s own statement that (to paraphrase) “no nation state was the source of the documents in his possession.”
I’m sure Mexico was pimping just as hard for Hillary, although obviously most of that was in Spanish.
Thanks Russia?
Those are not Russians. They are from Pottsylvania.
Nobody has yet to describe how Russia interfered in the 2016 election in a detailed fashion. Until I see this with proof, I will not believe Russia did anything at all.
Please, someone, describe for me how Russia even influenced one person to vote against Hillary. The democrats keep making the accusation that Russia somehow affected the vote but without one scrap of evidence. So far, after 8 months of accusations, there is no hard evidence that the Russians changed anything in the election. I wonder if after another 3 years of this crap, prior to the 2020 election, the democrats will still be able to pull this off.
Every time they are pressed for answers to questions like yours they always sputter off some complaint about RT or Internet Trolls.
As if Americans should be protected from Russian TV. They are complete idiots.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.