Wow! I thoroughly enjoyed that...thanks!
Whatever opportunities that Fauxahontas had, she claims are not available to young people today. So what were the conditions when she had the opportunities?
Would it not be a right and proper thing to try to restore those conditions and room for opportunities? That is what she seems to think brought her to her current level.
But no, a new “leveling” of the playing field, by systematically weighing one hand on the scale, while pushing others away because they are not the “politically correct” people, i.e., the “white privilege” youth.
Listen, the roots from which any of us have sprung is a matter of indifference to any honest person, and all these “affirmative action” programs only dilute the real development of a true work ethic, and divide up rewards inappropriately.
We don’t have enough poor people in this country, that have little or no capability to contribute in full measure to the robust growth of the society as a whole, so we have to import MORE? The deal is to make the open access to means of self improvement available to ALL, not just a few protected classes. And that involves, in large measure, the government keeping their hands OFF the flow of goods, services and ideas in the marketplace. Lower taxes, less regulation works every time if a growing economy is the objective.
I don’t see ANY of this in her agenda. More regulation, more taxation, demanding ever greater submission to what are decreed to be the “correct” responses and assignment of rewards. The Senator is the spokesperson for some kind of “command and control” economy, and they all end up working in the same reliable manner, when the jack-booted thugs are given full authority to “enforce” the directives by all means necessary.
The gulags are a natural outgrowth of that system.