[omega4412]

Good for Trump. For legal reasons we need to end all chain migration, not just for DACA recipients. If it’s for DACA recipients alone, they will find one federal judge to rule that the provision is unconstitutional because it is Discriminatory and shows Animus toward 3rd cousins once removed of DACA recipients.

[Zhang Fei]

Good for Trump. For legal reasons we need to end all chain migration, not just for DACA recipients. If it’s for DACA recipients alone, they will find one federal judge to rule that the provision is unconstitutional because it is Discriminatory and shows Animus toward 3rd cousins once removed of DACA recipients.

---

Chain migration is part of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1965. If Trump won’t even flush DACA, which he can do with an executive order, and zero congressional input, he won’t be flushing the INA of 1965, even if the filibuster were done away with.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Immigration_and_Nationality_Act_of_1965

Trump is soft on immigration. He needs to be threatened with the denial of a 2nd term like Bush pere if he is to be forced back on the straight and narrow. Register your displeasure today, not on Free Republic, but at https://www.whitehouse.gov/contact