To: cotton1706
3 posted on
09/14/2017 2:29:29 PM PDT by
gibsonguy
To: gibsonguy
20-0 not good. No, it isn't.
Anyone who says this is "winning" is a fool.
5 posted on
09/14/2017 2:47:26 PM PDT by
fwdude
(Democrats have not been this angry since Republicans freed the slaves.)
To: gibsonguy
Gee, maybe the guy was really qualified!
7 posted on
09/14/2017 2:55:23 PM PDT by
fortheDeclaration
(Pr 14:34 Righteousness exalteth a nation:but sin is a reproach to any people)
To: gibsonguy
A federal judge in North Dakota acted late on Thursday to block the Obama administration’s controversial water pollution rule, hours before it was due to take effect.
Judge Ralph Erickson of the District Court for the District of North Dakota....
The decision is a major roadblock for the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)....
8 posted on
09/14/2017 3:03:47 PM PDT by
fortheDeclaration
(Pr 14:34 Righteousness exalteth a nation:but sin is a reproach to any people)
To: gibsonguy
“20-0 not good”
I agree. It’s worrisome when the Dims are in total agreement.
12 posted on
09/14/2017 3:55:36 PM PDT by
SharpRightTurn
(Chuck Schumer--giving pond scum everywhere a bad name.)
To: gibsonguy
20-0 not good. On the flip side - if the nominee is going to be passed anyway, what would the holdouts gain by voting "Nay"? This way they look less obstructionist.
14 posted on
09/15/2017 2:32:03 AM PDT by
trebb
(Where in the the hell has my country gone?)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson