What I want to know is did he decide not to prosecute before he looked at any evidence? Not that he actually looked at any.
Who are you referring to? The information I provided pointed to a deal being cut to let Lerner off in exchange for her testimony that Koskinen had done something dirty.
While true that no testimony was needed to can Koskinen, Mueller was waiting in the wings to charge Trump with Obstruction of Justice should Trump fire Koskinen. Because Mueller wanted to sniff into Trump’s IRS records.
As I posted, Lerner is HATED and deserves punishment but she can’t hurt Trump now, she’s gone.
Whereas, Koskinen is still there ready to cause trouble with Mueller by his side.
So set the stage with charges against Koskinen, then fire him. Mueller can’t claim Obstruction for firing a dirty commissioner.