I guess you know more than tens of millions of dollars of supercomputers.
~~~~~~~~~~
With "tens of millions of dollars of supercomputers", you just get more garbage out -- faster...
That is one of the major problems with "Climate Change": an infinitesimal error in starting assumptions (or ignoring a single other influencing factor) yields mountainous error after projection. And, the farther out you try to project, the worse the error and divergence gets.
~~~~~~~~~~~~
Nobody (with "tens of millions of dollars of supercomputers") can predict where that huge hurricane will be one day from now. What makes them think that "tens of millions of dollars of supercomputers" can help them forecast the effect of an infinitesimally small change in the infinitesimally small fraction of the atmosphere that is CO2 -- and extend that asinine forecast out across DECADES?
That's especially true when they start with the asinine assumption that a minuscule micro-fraction of a single gas in the entire atmosphere actually affects the whole in any measurable manner -- without tracking the effects of every other possible atmospheric component -- at the same time..
MOOSAKE!!!
Physical chemist sends...