Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: dirtboy

You could say that but they were still way off. If you put half the Gulf of Mexico within the cone, you’re probably going to be right.


2,081 posted on 09/09/2017 6:33:10 AM PDT by boycott
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2076 | View Replies ]


To: boycott

The point is, they always say, be prepared if you are in the cone. Also, forecasting has improved since Katrina so the cones are smaller, but there is always a fair amount of uncertainty more than 3 days out.


2,085 posted on 09/09/2017 6:35:35 AM PDT by dirtboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2081 | View Replies ]

To: boycott
The slower a storm is moving, the more there's a chance for other influences in the weather to re-steer it. Katina was going 7mph in your chart above. Irma has been going 12-14.

Add to that: None of the major models show anything like that. The Euro and the UKMet especially have been on target all along.

So is there a 0% chance that Irma does something weird? No, but those odds are probably no more than 1-2%.

So y'all stop cherry-picking rogue storms to confuse people.


2,101 posted on 09/09/2017 6:50:58 AM PDT by alancarp (George Orwell was an optimist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2081 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson