Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: VanDeKoik

You are accusing me of somehow being inconsistent but I am pretty sure I didn’t say anything about them convincing Trump not to touch the issue. He has now touched it, pressed by a legal deadline, but making it clear he wants Congress to encode it.

Jivanka are pro-amnesty. Ivanka considered making it one of her signature issues when Trump one, but decided to make it one of those where she said she wouldn’t be taking public credit, but she thought you could see her influence in the actions that her father’s admin would end up taking. She called it pretty well, IMO.


279 posted on 09/06/2017 8:51:05 AM PDT by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 272 | View Replies ]


To: 9YearLurker

The retoric from the people that swear to Christ those two literally run the White House is inconsistent to the point where the people that love running to it as a placeholder for not knowing what the hell they are even talking about, sound like loons because people that pay attention can clearly see that it takes every position on the same issues.


282 posted on 09/06/2017 8:54:07 AM PDT by VanDeKoik
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 279 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson