Still, Saddam Hussein was GHW Bush's fault, who let him off the hook when he was on the ropes and our forward troops could see the Baghdad skyline.
We should have cut Iraq up into Kurdistan in the North, give the Sunni part to Syria, and from the Shi'ite side made the Protectorate of Shitstain.
Then, no Clinton, cause Bush would have done his job and I doubt Clinton would have beaten him.
THEN... No US troops in they Ay-rab holy land for Osama to get Mu-slimes all fired up over.
Of course, no Clinton means Billy Jeff couldn't have refused the CIA in-progress hit on Bin Laden. And perhaps the towers would still be standing, and our Pentagon would not have a hole in our hearts, and the there wouldn't be a Eurarabia in the future...
911 is a huge can of worms as you get into it and look at the company and who owned it after the first attack. The big story there is who did the repairs on the first attack of the towers and what happens in the ensuing years.
The Biden solution. Sounds great until you get into the details. The Turks, Iran, and Russia would never allow an independent Kurdistan. Would the Iraqi Sunnis want to be part of Syria? And how long would a Shi'a state remain independent of Iran?
Iraq is a viable state because of the oil which is located in the North (Kurd) and the South (Shia). The Iraqi Constitution contains provisions for a relatively autonomous Kurdish state, but the oil revenue is divided among the rest of the country as well.
And exactly how much power and influence does the US have when it comes to dividing up Iraq? Is that something we want to take on?