Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Responsibility2nd
She’s nuts. She over stepped her duties.

Hardly. Patient confidentiality is a very real issue. HIPAA and the 4th Amendment are in play here.

The unconscious person in her hospital was the victim of a head-on collision caused by a perp (who died in this same collision) the Utah police were chasing.

There is no cause for this victim's blood to be drawn.

She's on the phone talking to hospital officials, and relaying information. If the hospital would have drawn the blood and given it to the cop, they would have violated both HIPAA, and the 4th Amendment. The hospital, and possibly the nurse, would have then subjected themselves to two potential lawsuits by the victim in this case, and any blood drawn would have been inadmissible in court.

No judge in his/her right mind would issue a warrant in this case, and there is no reason for this victim to be under arrest.

57 posted on 09/01/2017 8:16:47 AM PDT by IYAS9YAS (There are two kinds of people: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]


To: IYAS9YAS

“Hardly. Patient confidentiality is a very real issue. HIPAA and the 4th Amendment are in play here.
The unconscious person in her hospital was the victim of a head-on collision caused by a perp (who died in this same collision) the Utah police were chasing.
There is no cause for this victim’s blood to be drawn.”

On the contrary, federal law requires a blood test be taken when a commercial truck driver is involved in a fatal collision regardless of who is at fault.


67 posted on 09/01/2017 8:22:50 AM PDT by JoeRed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson