Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: pepsionice
If she went his way...she’d draw the blood illegally, and give prosecution case an ample chance to be thrown out by the judge.

There's no case against the unconscious patient. He is a victim in this. The police in Utah were chasing a perp and the perp hit the now-unconscious patient head-on in a crash during the chase.

There's absolutely no reason to draw blood from this person, no reason for him to be under arrest, and no reason for a warrant to be issued for a blood draw.

17 posted on 09/01/2017 7:51:34 AM PDT by IYAS9YAS (There are two kinds of people: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: IYAS9YAS

Also I am sure the hospital did all the necessary blood draws in the course of regular treatment and that information could be obtained via a warrant.


23 posted on 09/01/2017 7:56:03 AM PDT by LukeL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

To: IYAS9YAS

Well. If the victim was under influence of sometin’ it would illiminate the matter...why couldnt the officer get a warrant from on-call judge over phone with resultant fax?
....or official email etc..officer would have to demonstrate due cause and prove it....hey why cant we have a 911 judge...we got emts, ambulance chasers, firemen, police, news reporters, why not judges?


32 posted on 09/01/2017 8:01:11 AM PDT by Getready (Wisdom is more valuable than gold and diamonds, and harder to find)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

To: IYAS9YAS

re: “There’s absolutely no reason to draw blood from this person, no reason for him to be under arrest, and no reason for a warrant to be issued for a blood draw.”

The Police chase went very bad. The Cops were trying to get info to cover their asses!


121 posted on 09/01/2017 9:21:54 AM PDT by BobNative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

To: IYAS9YAS

I beg to differ. The police are in CYA mode since this accident was in part because they were in a high speed pursuit. Their looking at deflecting the liability and insurance claim / lawsuit from the victim because they didn’t back off.

If they can show some evidence of impairment on the victims part then they can try to make a case that this impairment hindered the victims ability to take some sort of evasive action.


144 posted on 09/01/2017 9:42:03 AM PDT by shotgun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

To: IYAS9YAS

Ah pay attention Son, “He is a victim,” YOU DO NOT KNOW THAT, he could have caused the accident,Sherlock..


262 posted on 09/01/2017 3:11:15 PM PDT by hawg-farmer - FR..October 1998 (---->VMFA 235 '69 -'72 KMCAS <--- F4 PHANTOM... FLYING BRICK)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson