[Truth29]

If we had an aggressive DOJ that supported the President, they would be looking at options to remove judges who have stopped enforcing the law and are engaged in personnel vendettas or making up the law.

[IWontSubmit]

If we had an aggressive DOJ that supported the President, they would be looking at options to remove judges who have stopped enforcing the law and are engaged in personnel vendettas or making up the law.

[Pravious]

If we had an aggressive DOJ that supported the President, they would be looking at options to remove judges who have stopped enforcing the law and are engaged in personnel vendettas or making up the law.
—
Yes. Hugely disappointing DOJ. Do these people do anything to earn their paychecks?

[hanamizu]

If we had an aggressive DOJ that supported the President, they would be looking at options to remove judges

---

The only way to remove judges is not in the hands of the DOJ. The House must impeach and the Senate vote (by 2/3 majority) to convict.

[Neidermeyer]

If we had an aggressive DOJ that supported the President, they would be looking at options to remove judges who have stopped enforcing the law and are engaged in personnel vendettas or making up the law.
****************
It would be proper for the DOJ to file complaints against any judge that goes against the constitution in any case and make it plain that federal charges may be forthcoming.