Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: GregNH

“.... racially charged birther conspiracy ....”

1. racially charged?

HUH? What’s “race” got to do with it? I’m the biggest “birther” out there and it has NOTHING to do with race. It has 100% to do with eligibility according to The Constitution of the United States of America.

2. birther

“You’re one of those, but what am I”. One of those immature, childish, name calling diversions to try and marginalize your opponents. Unfortunately, it worked. Or should I say “we allowed” it to work.

Myself, I accepted the term as a badge of honor, having studied the issue of eligibility for years, since it first came up regarding Obama.

I KNOW it to be a legitimate concern. I KNOW that Obama was and is ineligible to the office of president and vice president of the United States (REGARDLESS of where he was born) according to the original intent of the constitution AND according to judicial review by the United States Supreme Court.

I am also quite certain that Obama was not born in the United States.

Why else would anyone proffer a forged, FAKE, doctored, layered, fabricated document (birth certificate copy)?

The only not forged, not FAKE, not doctored, not layered, not fabricated document (birth certificate copy) I have seen is the so-called Lucas Smith, foot print, Kenyan birth certificate for Obama.

It was not computer generated. It was an actual certified copy of a document. The copy was obtained from the Coast Province General Hospital in Mombasa Kenya.

So why didn’t everyone else go get a copy for themselves? They weren’t exactly handing them out. Lucas Smith had to BRIBE people to get it!

see article: http://www.thepostemail.com/2010/09/05/exclusive-lucas-daniel-smith-speaks-with-the-post-email/


48 posted on 08/23/2017 5:34:13 AM PDT by faucetman (Ju"st the facts, ma'am, Just the facts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: faucetman
“You’re one of those, but what am I”. One of those immature, childish, name calling diversions to try and marginalize your opponents. Unfortunately, it worked. Or should I say “we allowed” it to work.

I dispute your point here. We didn't allow it to work. We were simply in no position to stop it from working. Liberals control the entire broadcasting system in this nation, and until we can bypass their ability to censor us, they can get away with making pronouncements and getting the public to believe them.

Give us a years worth of time on a network where we can hammer our position over and over and over again, and we would convince the public that there is something there when it comes to questioning Obama's citizenship.

But in addition to the Liberal attacks on the issue, the Rinos of our side could not wait to jump into the fray and chime in with the Liberals. Many many many Republicans condemned any efforts to question Obama's legitimacy. They effectively gave aid and comfort to the enemy because they thought the issue would be politically bad. (Again, based on how the Liberal Media would treat them, making it once again about control of the airwaves.)

88 posted on 08/23/2017 7:14:56 AM PDT by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson