Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: David

The legal term I had been trying to remember is the De Facto Officer Doctrine which says that acts performed by a person acting under the color of official title are valid, even though it is later discovered that the that person’s appointment or election to office was illegal. So anything Obama did in office stands.


143 posted on 08/23/2017 10:37:59 AM PDT by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies ]


To: DoodleDawg; LucyT
The legal term I had been trying to remember is the De Facto Officer Doctrine which says that acts performed by a person acting under the color of official title are valid, even though it is later discovered that the that person’s appointment or election to office was illegal. So anything Obama did in office stands.

No. That doctrine is not applicable where the deficiency is attributed to ineligibility to hold the position.

154 posted on 08/23/2017 12:25:38 PM PDT by David
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 143 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson