Even pre-DNA that account is completely damning.
Does the defense have any kind of response to that?
And just WHAT DNA evidence "exonerates" Williams?
He was clearly there.
Any extra DNA evidence would only point to some kind of accomplice.
The guy is STILL guilty beyond any reasonable doubt, even with phantom accomplices, he's still on the hook.
DNA was an unknown male. Knife was from the home. Could have been the husband’s or any visitor that was invited for dinner.