Posted on 08/19/2017 9:55:22 AM PDT by Kaslin
The first shots in our new civil war were fired after Charlottesville when many Democratic leaders claimed that they had the right to use physical force against anyone they didnt like.
While cowardly leftist leaders are trying to portray themselves as fighting Hitler they are really fighting anyone they dont agree with. Remember that some Democrats said that Rep. Steve Scalise had it coming since he opposed gun control and that Democrats have been silent when left-wing violence was used to prevent Republicans marching in a parade in Portland.
Facing a continued loss of power because their radical agenda is toxic to most Americans, the Democrat leadership -- which includes the MSM -- have decided that they have the right to physically attack anyone who stands in their way.
Like their Nazi and Communist forefathers, todays Democrat leaders are comfortable sending swarms of Brownshirts out to beat into submission anyone who stands between them and power.
Under Obama, Democrats renounced the rule of law by declaring that they could choose to not enforce laws they didnt like and make up laws that Congress never passed. Now theyre saying that they have the right to attack anyone who dares speak out in disagreement. Rep. Scalise wasnt a Nazi or white nationalist, nor were the Republicans in Portland, or the speakers that Democrats forcibly prevented from speaking in Berkeley. Yet the Democratic leaderships condemnation of all of those events has been muted at best.
(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...
Bttt.
5.56mm
I would support President Trump declaring martial law , if things get any worse . I would be glad to immediately join and serve with martial law enforcement militia .
We are 63 million strong - deputize us .
More like circuses of the bread and circuses variety. More gladiator fights. That is what the country needs.
Don’t get in the way when your enemy is destroying itself.
Watch it on tv...the safest way.
Thanks for posting
>>This is not just true, it is factual
Can you provide an example of something that’s true but not factual? Or something that’s factual but not true? Just curious.
>>Oh, stop it. There isn’t going to be a civil war. 99.5% of Americans aren’t even paying attention to any of this nonsense.
All of these rallies are being attended by, at most, by a few hundred nuts on each side. Everyone else in America is enjoying their Saturday after a hard week of work.
You have this exactly right, although that percentage no doubt will change if and when the safety of an increasing number of people is threatened by these goons.
Zach Lee
Can you provide an example of something thats true but not factual? Or something thats factual but not true? Just curious.
I think you're misreading that. "[I]t is factual" emphasizes that "it is just not true".
Clumsy wording, perhaps, but Kaslin's remark is right on the mark.
Jesus Christ: You can't impeach Him and He ain't gonna resign.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.