So the point is?
He deliberately ran into people.
Hang him.
He deliberately ran into people.
Hang him.
The best video of the first collision that I have seen is one Tucker Carlson showed tonight where the defendant's vehicle strikes a black and white car from the rear at a high enough speed to damage seriously the black and white car's rear fender and the driver's car's front fender. There are one to three people between the two vehicles and the impact is enough to send at least one of them partially flying over the black and white car. It's essential to know why the defendant did that, as it was essential to know why George Zimmerman shot Trayvon Martin.
Right now it's impossible, in good faith, even to say that the defendant "deliberately ran into people," just as it was impossible to say, in good faith, that Zimmerman "gunned down poor Trayvon like a dog." Indeed, I've seen no present evidence that the decedent was struck in that first collision. If you have any, please share it with the rest of us.
Odd, how on the flimsiest of evidence, you're anxious to convict that young man without a trial and "Hang him." Sounds like a lynching to me, just like the Klan giving some poor black man a "fair trial" on a bogus rape charge before they hang him. But, of course, radical Marxist terrorist wannabes never do anything like that, just as Lenin, Beria, Stalin never did.