[RooRoobird20]

It’s on private property.

[avital2]

i think it is state property, actually

[RooRoobird20]

Stacey Abrams is a large angry woman, “Donna Shaquita Triumphant!” Check out her web site.

This may play well to her base, but it’s not going to help her get elected governor.

Again, Stone Mountain is on private land and has a lot of government legal protections associated with it.

[BubbaJunebug]

It is state property and was purchased by the state in the late 50’s. The carving cannot be altered or removed without the approval of the state legislature

[Repeal The 17th]

“... It’s on private property ...”
-
No.
You are wrong.

[Keyhopper]

Really? Wow, if I was them I would action that off. One inch at a time

[sargon]

Stone Mountain is beautiful. We are at war. I am starting a ping list on this subject. Destruction of our history ping. Let me know if you want on the list.

---

It’s on private property.

Good point, if true, but the article begins:

"Democratic gubernatorial candidate Stacey Abrams called for the removal of the giant carving that depicts three Confederate war leaders on the face of state-owned Stone Mountain"

So which is it. Regardless, this work of art should remain, and it will make an excellent cause celebre which will hopefully illustrate just how hysterical and unhinged the PC fascists have become...