Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: rollo tomasi

I know about Raleigh and the Roanoke Colony, which certainly did launch during Elizabeth I’s reign. And you’re correct that the Queen invested in Raleigh’s enterprise for that colony.

But her involvement was just an investment, and she did that mostly as a favor to Raleigh since she was impressed by him. I doubt she knew any details.

Plus, there’s no documents showing Raleigh planned on slaves there. I doubt that there were plans for slaves. None at that time knew the American colonies would prove to be a source for things like cotton/tobacco.


16 posted on 08/17/2017 8:58:30 AM PDT by advance_copy (Stand for life or nothing at all)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]


To: advance_copy
The Queen fully supported/funded Hawkins' slave trade into the West Indies. Primary sources confirm this, hence the article is somewhat correct.

I mentioned it was disingenuous due to linking African slaves/Virginia/British North American colonies (Only one which got pulverized and of course no African slaves present there)/Queen Elizabeth/.

The truth is Hawkins/African slaves/Caribbean/Queen Elizabeth.
17 posted on 08/17/2017 11:27:32 AM PDT by rollo tomasi (Working hard to pay for deadbeats and corrupt politicians.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson