[DiogenesLamp]

The line of argument was your claim that Lincoln ordered Taney arrested and my pointing out that there is no real evidence that he did. By tossing Merrick into the mix I assume you are conceding my point.

Well it's no wonder you are all turned around. I present you proof that Lincoln did in fact have a Judge arrested, and you see it as evidence that he wouldn't do such a thing.

I really don't know how to argue with such a backward sort of understanding of the available facts.

A guard was placed at his house...

"No further questions for this witness."

[DoodleDawg]

I present you proof that Lincoln did in fact have a Judge arrested, and you see it as evidence that he wouldn't do such a thing.

And as I have pointed out, you have presented no proof at all, just unsupported allegations.

I really don't know how to argue with such a backward sort of understanding of the available facts.

Just continue to do what you have been doing all along; throw out crap and claim it's fact.