Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: trebb
I have thought that statement through. One group required a permit to assemble. Should they have to get a permit? The scum of black-lives-matter were not required to. Yes, there should be no requirement for assembly, but the assembly was on PUBLIC property and the laws of the Commonwealth require a permit to use public venues.

And I still assert the whole thing was a set-up as soon as the supremacist scum applied for a permit. Think it through? Ha! See the reality, dude.

53 posted on 08/16/2017 6:20:16 AM PDT by MHGinTN (A dispensational perspective is a powerful tool for discernment)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies ]


To: MHGinTN
You really do your best to make sure you miss the point. Slimy as they are, the supremacist scum was acting legally. That's protected by the Constitution whether you like it or not. The Left wing scum instigated the violence because they disagree with the supremacists - they should be afforded their own opportunities to disagree within the law but not to "barge in" and shut them down with violence any more than those on college campuses should be allowed to physically bar conservative speakers.

Disallow even the slimiest the opportunity to freely assemble and you set precedent for shutting down anyone for political reasons.

Take some more meds - the current dose isn't working.

54 posted on 08/16/2017 7:03:01 AM PDT by trebb (Where in the the hell has my country gone?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson