Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: aquila48

You can’t emotionally learn organic chemistry. No matter how hard you look at it, the female physical body is designed to be dominant feminine. While this facilitates empathy, compassion, creativity and attachment necessary for bonding with children, it does not facilitate linear, logical thought processes or memory recall for large quantities of factual information.

While both males and females can alter their consciousness into either masculine or feminine dominant aspects, there are significant side effects of doing so.

Sexual attraction regarding gender is a function of dominant aspect of consciousness and what is intellectually acceptable. If it is not acceptable for a feminine male to be gay he will just seek a masculine female and vice versa.

Thus, sexual attraction is primarily a function of the dominant aspect of consciousness and the corresponding attributes exhibited in personality, thought processes and behavioral characteristics are also directly influenced by the same.

Ever since my death experience I have extreme sensitivity to human consciousness and perceive it as a physical object. I feel people’s thoughts and stored memories all the way back to conception as physical objects in a field around the body.

Memories are stored as holograms at the intersection of the two aspects of consciousness, which can be retrieved through either aspect. Logical masculine consciousness stores and retrieves memories in a linear directory format while the emotional feminine stores and retrieves memories based upon the frequency of emotional indices attached to the actual memory. This is why emotional bridging is a powerful tool for retrieving suppressed memories and also why PTSD creates havoc with many lives.

I have found that failure to match the stimulus to the dominant pattern of a child’s consciousness creates many learning disabilities. The child can be very intelligent, but not comprehend material that is not matched to their consciousness pattern.


10 posted on 08/12/2017 2:45:30 AM PDT by tired&retired (Blessings)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: tired&retired

What you state, is very interesting.


15 posted on 08/12/2017 4:13:57 AM PDT by always vigilant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: tired&retired

Bookmark


19 posted on 08/12/2017 4:55:02 AM PDT by silverleaf (We voted for change, not leftover change)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: tired&retired

> No matter how hard you look at it, the female physical body is designed to be dominant feminine.

Liberals have been arguing FOR exactly this point every time a woman runs for office. They constantly say “we need more women in politics, boardrooms, and leadership”. Not simply for fairness but they claim very directly that women are better than men at compassion, sympathy, empathy, negotiating for the benefit of all parties and society rather than in their best interest.

They insist exactly what the google memo says. I think they make the argument even more clearly and directly than the memo. But only when it’s an effort to put a women in a position. The same description of women is unacceptable to explain why more women don’t have a position.

I’d like to see someone take the “gender differences” parts of the memo and surround them with an argument to vote Hillary for president. I bet liberals would agree 100% with the memo (if they didn’t know the source of the “gender differences” parts.


23 posted on 08/12/2017 5:23:51 AM PDT by LostPassword
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson