>>Regardless, you argue by jumping to unsupported conclusions.
It’s the INTERNET. Do you supply citations for everything you say? Of course not. Let me remind of your comment that started all this:
>>I’m tired of seeing the neo-Right using terms like “Do-Nothing Senate”. What a wrong-headed concept for those who love freedom and America. What does the Right want - an activist federal government???? NO!!!!
You keep acting like you were right when you said this. I explained what we mean by “Do Nothing Senate” and you persisted in your ignorance. Then, you started walking it back by pretending that you never said it. You STARTED with an unsupported conclusion pal and just went to Crazytown after that.
Who's "we"? Certainly the article doesn't explain that it doesn't mean an activist Senate regardless of the constitutionality or desirability of its actions which is my objection to this phrase. Many times this phrase appears where this explanation doesn't exist.
Who is "we" and what is your explanation?