A truly freakish article.
Here’s a quote from it, “Once a politician has spent as many years in the public eye as Clinton has, always trailed by a faint cloud of real or imagined scandal, it becomes impossible to distinguish the authentic from the tightly controlled public image.”
THIS is what they are intentionally doing to Trump, and they have the amorality to try to defend Clinton with it. They are slinging mud at Trump 24/7 in order to imply later that innocent people don’t garner the sheer volume of allegations that he has. This is a favorite of the left - accusation after accusation so that no one would have the time and money to fight every innuendo and then strike the pose of, “Where there’s smoke, there’s fire....” So none of their accusations need to be true, there just have to be enough of them for the MSM to insist that surely no innocent person could have inspired such “doubt” in the MSM, the “public” etc.
In 2008 (after she lost to Obama) analysts clearly identified her problem: There was no “swing vote”; everyone knew her, and either loved or hated her - and not enough people loved her. As true in 2016 as it was in 2008.