‘Coincidental,’ is the oldest Obot trick in the book. They isolate each of the anomalies surrounding Obama, his records, his lies, etc., and say, ‘It’s just a coincidence.’
Iow, they pretend that every ‘odd,’ incident or record, etc., re to Obama is the ONLY such oddity. Then they smugly write that single item off as a mere ‘coincidence.’
The next time an anomalous issue re Obama comes up, Obots blank out all the rest, and pretend the new item is the ONLY odd thing re to Obama.
If permitted to get away with it, Obots will play this, ‘It’s only this one, single, isolated anomaly, and it’s a sheer coincidence,’ game forever. I’ve seen it happen.
If there actually was only one weird issue with Obama, or maybe two at the outside, possibly this ‘coincidental,’ idea would hold up.
As matters stand, it is the embodiment of dishonesty. If all the anomalies, irregularities, gaps, questionable records, lies and other issues re Obama were compiled in a single list, it would take a moron to consider them all ‘coincidental.’ A certified moron.
The dishonesty of Obots is their principle feature. It has to be. You cannot devote a sizable chunk of your life to defending a pathological liar without becoming fundamentally dishonest yourself.
I agree with ya. I’m also well-aware that FR became infested with people running interference for Obama, especially in the 2008-2016 time frame. Of course, Hillary became the victim, in 2015 or so......
I like how Obama was a victim of his BC number being later than 2 girls born the day after him. FILO, they said. Darn, Obama the victim of circumstances again.
O.K.
I like how Obama accidentally signed his SS reg card the day AFTER it was mailed. Darn, Obama the victim of circumstances again.
I like how the century conveniently fell off Obama’s SS reg card. Darn, Obama the victim of circumstances again.
I say he has a falsified paper trail. Some of it, anyways. If people don’t like that, well, guess that’s just too bad.
[Iow, they pretend that every ‘odd,’ incident or record, etc., re to Obama is the ONLY such oddity. Then they smugly write that single item off as a mere ‘coincidence.’]
Think of the amazing coincidence of how Seth Rich was murdered (oops “victim of botched robbery” and then the Wikileaks info stops on that chain and JA all but openly states that it was SR - he could have been more clear without stating his name.
Wiped, you know, like with a cloth.