(Areong, NASA). Kasei Valles, seen in MOLA elevation data. Flow was from bottom left to right.
Hmmm ... looks like running water on the surface, not a global flood. Please try again.
In the days when few travelled the world and saw clear evidence, this was never questioned. Now we know better! #isgenesishistroy. Daily lectures of real world science.
Do you understand what the word ‘Global’ means?
Oh, and another easily refuted detail - the article doubles the length of the outflow - it is under 1,800 kilometers.
There are signs of erosion during a wet period early in the geological history of Mars. There is no evidence of a single global flood there just as there is no sign of such a flood here on earth.
In 2014 scientists discovered a very interesting find. The lead scientist noted there is a vast reservoir of water under the earth's surface.
The money quote from the article.
"If [the stored water] wasn't there, it would be on the surface of the Earth, and mountaintops would be the only land poking out," he said.
http://www.natureworldnews.com/articles/7560/20140613/vast-underwater-ocean-trapped-beneath-earths-crust.htm
There are other explanations that require no water.
expanding Mars:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d44Jj_3gp-M
electric Mars:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tRV1e5_tB6Y
The Mississippi delta looks just like that. Doesn’t seem to indicate a global flood.
All - let me introduce you to a new book, ‘The Worldwide Flood: Uncovering and Correcting the Most Profound Error in the History of Science.’ It was published recently and is available at any on-line outlet such as this:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Outburst_flood
Now you know