You are incessantly negative and alarmist.
Just STFU.
No.
But let me make sure I understand you're point. If after the President has made his feelings about Sessions and his actions clear - recusing himself, not investigating the Clintons, not deserving of loyalty - and Sessions just ignores him and remains as AG then that doesn't make Trump look weak? Really?
Well, whatever you might say about President Trump's behavior, it sure wouldn't reflect well on Jeff Sessions to openly defy him.
The President—as of right now—clearly wants Jeff Sessions to resign. Can we all agree on that?
Now, given that fact, why would the "gentlemanly, loyal, ethical" Jeff Sessions thumb his nose at the President, at whose pleasure he serves?
If Jeff Sessions doesn't resign, and forces the President to fire him, then Sessions will have deliberately and vindictively made a bad situation worse. And that would be a negative reflection on his character...
I think you are an honest person but one with a very negative take on life (a natural faultfinder). That said, you are at least trustworthy compared to many never-Trumpers still here.
My point is this.
Don't trust what you read from the WSJ, the NYTimes, or the rest of the lib media. And don't necessarily trust what Trump says on Twitter.
This is war...and Trump is nothing if not an ardent follower of The Art of War.
Deception of the enemy.
Trump's book, The Art of the Deal, was a play on Sun Tzu's The Art of War.