Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Karl Spooner
-- So why did Sessions recuse himself? --

Jefferson Sessions Statement, June 13, 2017

Let me also explain clearly the circumstances of my recusal from the investigation into the Russian interference with the 2016 election. I was sworn in as Attorney General on Thursday, February 9th. The very next day, I met with career Department officials, including a senior ethics official, to discuss some things publicly reported in the press and that might have some bearing on the issue of recusal. From that point, February 10th, until I announced my formal recusal on March 2nd, I was never briefed on any investigative details and did not access information about the investigation; I received only the limited information that the Department's career officials determined was necessary to inform my recusal decision. As such, I have no knowledge about this investigation beyond what has been publicly reported, and I have taken no action with regard to any such investigation. On the date of my formal recusal, my Chief of Staff sent an email to the heads of the relevant departments, including by name to Director Comey of the FBI, to instruct them to inform their staffs of this recusal and to advise them not to brief me or involve me in any such matters. And in fact, they have not. Importantly, I recused myself not because of any asserted wrongdoing on my part during the campaign, but because a Department of Justice regulation, 28 CFR 45.2, required it. That regulation states, in effect, that Department employees should not participate in investigations of a campaign if they have served as a campaign advisor.

42 posted on 07/21/2017 4:41:07 PM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]


To: Cboldt
If he had no knowledge of the investigation concerning himself, as he states, why did he recuse himself? "Public" innuendo is a very feeble excuse to do what he did. He actually misquotes the rule concerning the matter. He's either under investigation or not, just like it turned out with Trump when he supposedly under investigation, but it was confirmed that he was not.

“participate in a criminal investigation or prosecution if he has a personal or political relationship with any person or organization substantially involved in the conduct that is the subject of the investigation or prosecution, or who would be directly affected by the outcome.”

45 posted on 07/21/2017 5:52:25 PM PDT by Karl Spooner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson