The story I heard was the Russian lawyer made allegations about Hillary taking Russian money but had no evidence. That was the end of it.
If the Russian lawyer offered allegations about Trump taking Russian money without evidence to the Dems, the Dems would have run with it.
There is your difference.
“If the Russian lawyer offered allegations about Trump taking Russian money without evidence to the Dems, the Dems would have run with it.”
The Trump dossier that started the whole Russian collusion narrative was put together by a British spy (Christopher Steele) and the democrats have been running with it for a year.
Their hypocrisy knows no bounds.
Or pee-pee fetishes.