“You want to pay EMTs to drop everything and come the rescue of repeat overdoses just as they do with heart attacks, strokes, and other ills that flesh is heir to? Not with my tax money you don’t.”
////////////
So, what’s next? What treatment gets excluded because someone doesn’t like the victim’s life choices. .
First Responder: “OK guys, back to the station. This car accident victim’s blood alcohol content is over the limit. Forget about him. PACK UP AND MOVE OUT! Maybe we can still catch the last round of Pat and Vanna. Last one to the station washes dishes.”
Or...
First Responder: “OK guys, back to the station. This heart attack victim is a fatty. He obviously doesn’t care about himself. PACK UP AND MOVE OUT! Maybe we can still catch the last round of Pat and Vanna.” Last one to the station washes dishes.”
Or...
First Responder: “OK guys, back to the station. This hemorrhaging abortion victim has had two previous abortions Forget about her. PACK UP AND MOVE OUT! Maybe we can still catch the last round of Pat and Vanna. Last one to the station washes dishes.”
Or...
First Responder: “OK guys, back to the station. This old guy is just too old. Forget about his stroke PACK UP AND MOVE OUT! Maybe we can still catch the last round of Pat and Vanna. Last one to the station washes dishes.”
Not one of you addict enablers have given me any reason as to why the fruits of MY labor should be taken from me forcibly (remembering that for every dollar I earn, I have to give up some of my life) and then given to treat some a$$hole addict who decided that getting high was his goal in life.
Remember we're talking about limited resources here and how to allocate them.
If they are talking about Pat and Vanna, it might not be the victim that’s too old. ;P