Posted on 07/10/2017 3:48:41 PM PDT by BackRoads775
The Seattle City Council unanimously approved a pioneering new income tax on wealthy residents Monday. A a legal challenge is widely anticipated.
The measure applies a 2.25 percent tax on total income above $250,000 for individuals and above $500,000 for married couples filing their taxes together.
The city has estimated the tax will raise about $125 million a year and cost $10 million to $13 million to set up, plus $5 million to $6 million per year to run and enforce.
The councils finance committee cleared the tax last week, increasing the rate from 2 percent to 2.25 percent.
(Excerpt) Read more at seattletimes.com ...
I keep telling my relative who lives there that.
NYC does have an income tax; those NJ people bemoaning the horrible train situation pay it as well (for working in NYC).
If the people determining the legality of this are paid by taxpayers, don’t count on it being shot down. It is the hand that feeds them.
NYC has had an income tax for years; I don’t know by what authority.
Back when the Greater Depression started (2007/2008), the mayor of NYC and the governor of NY wanted the government to allow banks to pay bonuses from the taxpayer bailout funds because they were so dependent on their respective taxes on those bonuses. The morality or legality never even entered the discussion; they needed the tax revenue, and optics be damned.
The Obamunists wanted to federalize their socialism to prevent that flight of productive people from areas overrun with others that wanted everything provided for them. The tax situation in NJ has caused exactly that (flight of wealthy people), and even more destructive, the flight of their companies that employed Jerseyans.
Now we are bleeding young Americans who see no opportunity here...
Being a former city and county executive in Washington State, there is no provision in state law that gives cities and counties any authority to implement an income tax, otherwise all the cities and counties would have done this back in the 90’s when the state essentially started keeping 99% of all tax revenues for themselves.
They can’t in Washington, and even if they could the State would be first in line to take their share right off the top. Any tax collected by a city is subject to the state taking a percentage right off the top.
Sounds like Seattle is about to experience a glut of high end homes for sale.
Let me be one of the first to predict that total tax revenues decrease in Seattle if this is implemented.
A tax on income does NOT equal a tax on wealth.
Wealthy people do NOT have incomes. Their money is in funds, trusts and foundations. Of course they can use the money in these tax-free accounts to do as they please (think Bill Clinton getting a million dollars for one speech—goes to the Clinton Foundation—Clinton Foundation pays for all Bill’s needs, including the mortgage for his Chappaqua home, a fleet of vehicles and planes to cart his skinny ass around, and everything else he needs; no doubt the occasional fat bimbo...)
Nope, INCOME TAXES are applied against business people, owners of small businesses with lots of expenses, employers of small businesses...
Only hurts the city when they give up or move out.
Thank you.
Ha ha, thanks for the memory. I drove past that one day, in the quaint little town of “Freakmont”. Even the Seattle locals call it that. Well named.
On the other hand, looking at the Constitution there's nothing giving the federal government the authority to execute the War on Drugs, and indeed precedent
would (via the 18th Amendment) dictate that an amendment would be needed to have such legitimate authority.
So I wouldn't bet on it.
Not trying to argue with you point but that really is completely different conversation.
Yes, Dayton has a 2.25% tax and the tax is on the gross wages. That fast food worker may not pay Federal or state taxes because of deductions and credits. But there are no deductions or credits on the city income taxes. I know a lady that works as a home health aid - I help her with her taxes each year. She usually doesn't owe much in Fed or state, but she has 2.5% tax on every dime she makes.
All cities that I know of don't tax income that is not earned (retirement, interest, dividends, etc.), but they sure tax earned income (including rent).
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.